Exploit Public-Facing Application

Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network. The weakness in the system can be a software bug, a temporary glitch, or a misconfiguration.

Exploited applications are often websites/web servers, but can also include databases (like SQL), standard services (like SMB or SSH), network device administration and management protocols (like SNMP and Smart Install), and any other system with Internet-accessible open sockets.[1][2][3][4][5] On ESXi infrastructure, adversaries may exploit exposed OpenSLP services; they may alternatively exploit exposed VMware vCenter servers.[6][7] Depending on the flaw being exploited, this may also involve Exploitation for Defense Evasion or Exploitation for Client Execution.

If an application is hosted on cloud-based infrastructure and/or is containerized, then exploiting it may lead to compromise of the underlying instance or container. This can allow an adversary a path to access the cloud or container APIs (e.g., via the Cloud Instance Metadata API), exploit container host access via Escape to Host, or take advantage of weak identity and access management policies.

Adversaries may also exploit edge network infrastructure and related appliances, specifically targeting devices that do not support robust host-based defenses.[8][9]

For websites and databases, the OWASP top 10 and CWE top 25 highlight the most common web-based vulnerabilities.[10][11]

ID: T1190
Sub-techniques:  No sub-techniques
Tactic: Initial Access
Platforms: Containers, ESXi, IaaS, Linux, Network Devices, Windows, macOS
Contributors: Don Le, Stifel Financial; Praetorian; Yossi Weizman, Azure Defender Research Team
Version: 2.8
Created: 18 April 2018
Last Modified: 24 October 2025

Procedure Examples

ID Name Description
G1030 Agrius

Agrius exploits public-facing applications for initial access to victim environments. Examples include widespread attempts to exploit CVE-2018-13379 in FortiOS devices and SQL injection activity.[12]

G0007 APT28

APT28 has used a variety of public exploits, including CVE 2020-0688 and CVE 2020-17144, to gain execution on vulnerable Microsoft Exchange; they have also conducted SQL injection attacks against external websites.[13][14]

G0016 APT29

APT29 has exploited CVE-2019-19781 for Citrix, CVE-2019-11510 for Pulse Secure VPNs, CVE-2018-13379 for FortiGate VPNs, and CVE-2019-9670 in Zimbra software to gain access.[15][16]

G0087 APT39

APT39 has used SQL injection for initial compromise.[17]

G0096 APT41

APT41 exploited CVE-2020-10189 against Zoho ManageEngine Desktop Central through unsafe deserialization, and CVE-2019-19781 to compromise Citrix Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) and gateway devices.[18] APT41 leveraged vulnerabilities such as ProxyLogon exploitation or SQL injection for initial access.[19] APT41 exploited CVE-2021-26855 against a vulnerable Microsoft Exchange Server to gain initial access to the victim network.[20]

G1023 APT5

APT5 has exploited vulnerabilities in externally facing software and devices including Pulse Secure VPNs and Citrix Application Delivery Controllers.[21][22][23] [24]

C0046 ArcaneDoor

ArcaneDoor abused WebVPN traffic to targeted devices to achieve unauthorized remote code execution.[25]

G0001 Axiom

Axiom has been observed using SQL injection to gain access to systems.[26][27]

G0135 BackdoorDiplomacy

BackdoorDiplomacy has exploited CVE-2020-5902, an F5 BIP-IP vulnerability, to drop a Linux backdoor. BackdoorDiplomacy has also exploited mis-configured Plesk servers.[28]

G1043 BlackByte

BlackByte exploited vulnerabilities such as ProxyLogon and ProxyShell for initial access to victim environments.[29][30][31][32]

G0098 BlackTech

BlackTech has exploited a buffer overflow vulnerability in Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 6.0, CVE-2017-7269, in order to establish a new HTTP or command and control (C2) server.[33]

G0108 Blue Mockingbird

Blue Mockingbird has gained initial access by exploiting CVE-2019-18935, a vulnerability within Telerik UI for ASP.NET AJAX.[34]

S1184 BOLDMOVE

BOLDMOVE is associated with exploitation of CVE-2022-49475 in FortiOS.[35]

C0017 C0017

During C0017, APT41 exploited CVE-2021-44207 in the USAHerds application and CVE-2021-44228 in Log4j, as well as other .NET deserialization, SQL injection, and directory traversal vulnerabilities to gain initial access.[36]

C0018 C0018

During C0018, the threat actors exploited VMWare Horizon Unified Access Gateways that were vulnerable to several Log4Shell vulnerabilities, including CVE-2021-44228, CVE-2021-45046, CVE-2021-45105, and CVE-2021-44832.[37]

C0027 C0027

During C0027, Scattered Spider exploited CVE-2021-35464 in the ForgeRock Open Access Management (OpenAM) application server to gain initial access.[38]

G1021 Cinnamon Tempest

Cinnamon Tempest has exploited multiple unpatched vulnerabilities for initial access including vulnerabilities in Microsoft Exchange, Manage Engine AdSelfService Plus, Confluence, and Log4j.[39][40][41][42]

S1105 COATHANGER

COATHANGER is installed following exploitation of a vulnerable FortiGate device. [43]

C0029 Cutting Edge

During Cutting Edge, threat actors exploited CVE-2023-46805 and CVE-2024-21887 in Ivanti Connect Secure VPN appliances to enable authentication bypass and command injection. A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability, CVE-2024-21893, was identified later and used to bypass mitigations for the initial two vulnerabilities by chaining with CVE-2024-21887.[44][45][46][47][48]

G0035 Dragonfly

Dragonfly has conducted SQL injection attacks, exploited vulnerabilities CVE-2019-19781 and CVE-2020-0688 for Citrix and MS Exchange, and CVE-2018-13379 for Fortinet VPNs.[49]

G1006 Earth Lusca

Earth Lusca has compromised victims by directly exploiting vulnerabilities of public-facing servers, including those associated with Microsoft Exchange and Oracle GlassFish.[50]

G1003 Ember Bear

Ember Bear gains initial access to victim environments by exploiting external-facing services. Examples include exploitation of CVE-2021-26084 in Confluence servers; CVE-2022-41040, ProxyShell, and other vulnerabilities in Microsoft Exchange; and multiple vulnerabilities in open-source platforms such as content management systems.[51][52]

G1016 FIN13

FIN13 has exploited known vulnerabilities such as CVE-2017-1000486 (Primefaces Application Expression Language Injection), CVE-2015-7450 (WebSphere Application Server SOAP Deserialization Exploit), CVE-2010-5326 (SAP NewWeaver Invoker Servlet Exploit), and EDB-ID-24963 (SAP NetWeaver ConfigServlet Remote Code Execution) to gain initial access.[53][54]

G0046 FIN7

FIN7 has compromised targeted organizations through exploitation of CVE-2021-31207 in Exchange.[39]

C0053 FLORAHOX Activity

FLORAHOX Activity has exploited and infected vulnerable routers to recruit additional network devices into the ORB.[55]

G0117 Fox Kitten

Fox Kitten has exploited known vulnerabilities in Fortinet, PulseSecure, and Palo Alto VPN appliances.[56][57][58][59][60]

C0041 FrostyGoop Incident

FrostyGoop Incident was likely enabled by the adversary exploiting an unknown vulnerability in an external-facing router.[61]

G0093 GALLIUM

GALLIUM exploited a publicly-facing servers including Wildfly/JBoss servers to gain access to the network.[62][63]

G0115 GOLD SOUTHFIELD

GOLD SOUTHFIELD has exploited Oracle WebLogic vulnerabilities for initial compromise.[64]

G0125 HAFNIUM

HAFNIUM has exploited multiple vulnerabilities to compromise edge devices and on-premises versions of Microsoft Exchange Server.[65][66][67][68][40][69]

S0224 Havij

Havij is used to automate SQL injection.[70]

C0038 HomeLand Justice

For HomeLand Justice, threat actors exploited CVE-2019-0604 in Microsoft SharePoint for initial access.[71]

G1032 INC Ransom

INC Ransom has exploited known vulnerabilities including CVE-2023-3519 in Citrix NetScaler for initial access.[72][73]

G0004 Ke3chang

Ke3chang has compromised networks by exploiting Internet-facing applications, including vulnerable Microsoft Exchange and SharePoint servers.[74]

G0094 Kimsuky

Kimsuky has exploited various vulnerabilities for initial access, including Microsoft Exchange vulnerability CVE-2020-0688.[75]

G0065 Leviathan

Leviathan has used exploits against publicly-disclosed vulnerabilities for initial access into victim networks.[76]

C0049 Leviathan Australian Intrusions

Leviathan exploited public-facing web applications and appliances for initial access during Leviathan Australian Intrusions.[76]

G0059 Magic Hound

Magic Hound has exploited the Log4j utility (CVE-2021-44228), on-premises MS Exchange servers via "ProxyShell" (CVE-2021-34473, CVE-2021-34523, CVE-2021-31207), and Fortios SSL VPNs (CVE-2018-13379).[77][78][79][80][81][40]

G1051 Medusa Group

Medusa Group has leveraged public facing vulnerabilities in their campaigns against victim organizations to gain initial access.[82][83] Medusa Group has also utilized CVE-2024-1709 in ScreenConnect, and CVE-2023-48788 in Fortinet EMS for initial access to victim environments.[84]

G0045 menuPass

menuPass has leveraged vulnerabilities in Pulse Secure VPNs to hijack sessions.[85]

G1009 Moses Staff

Moses Staff has exploited known vulnerabilities in public-facing infrastructure such as Microsoft Exchange Servers.[86]

G0069 MuddyWater

MuddyWater has exploited the Microsoft Exchange memory corruption vulnerability (CVE-2020-0688).[87]

C0002 Night Dragon

During Night Dragon, threat actors used SQL injection exploits against extranet web servers to gain access.[88]

C0012 Operation CuckooBees

During Operation CuckooBees, the threat actors exploited multiple vulnerabilities in externally facing servers.[89]

C0048 Operation MidnightEclipse

During Operation MidnightEclipse, threat actors exploited CVE-2024-3400 in Palo Alto Networks GlobalProtect.[90][91]

C0014 Operation Wocao

During Operation Wocao, threat actors gained initial access by exploiting vulnerabilities in JBoss webservers.[92]

G1040 Play

Play has exploited known vulnerabilities for initial access including CVE-2018-13379 and CVE-2020-12812 in FortiOS and CVE-2022-41082 and CVE-2022-41040 ("ProxyNotShell") in Microsoft Exchange.[93][94]

S1242 Qilin

Qilin has been delivered through exploitation of exposed applications and interfaces including Citrix and RDP.[95]

C0055 Quad7 Activity

Quad7 Activity has enabled the exploitation of vulnerabilities for remote code execution capabilities in SOHO routers including CVE-2023-50224 and CVE-2025-9377 in TP-Link devices.[96][97]

G0106 Rocke

Rocke exploited Apache Struts, Oracle WebLogic (CVE-2017-10271), and Adobe ColdFusion (CVE-2017-3066) vulnerabilities to deliver malware.[98][99]

G1045 Salt Typhoon

Salt Typhoon has exploited CVE-2018-0171 in the Smart Install feature of Cisco IOS and Cisco IOS XE software for initial access.[100]

G0034 Sandworm Team

Sandworm Team exploits public-facing applications for initial access and to acquire infrastructure, such as exploitation of the EXIM mail transfer agent in Linux systems.[101][102]

G1041 Sea Turtle

Sea Turtle gained access to victim environments by exploiting multiple known vulnerabilities over several campaigns.[103][104]

C0045 ShadowRay

During ShadowRay, threat actors exploited CVE-2023-48022 on publicly exposed Ray servers to steal computing power and to expose sensitive data.[105]

C0058 SharePoint ToolShell Exploitation

During SharePoint ToolShell Exploitation, threat actors exploited authentication bypass and remote code execution vulnerabilities (CVE-2025-49706 and CVE-2025-49704) against on-premises SharePoint servers. This activity was characterized by crafted POST requests to the ToolPane endpoint /_layouts/15/ToolPane.aspx.[106][107][108][109][110][111]

S0623 Siloscape

Siloscape is executed after the attacker gains initial access to a Windows container using a known vulnerability.[112]

C0024 SolarWinds Compromise

During the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 exploited CVE-2020-0688 against the Microsoft Exchange Control Panel to regain access to a network.[113][15]

S0516 SoreFang

SoreFang can gain access by exploiting a Sangfor SSL VPN vulnerability that allows for the placement and delivery of malicious update binaries.[114]

C0052 SPACEHOP Activity

SPACEHOP Activity has enabled the exploitation of CVE-2022-27518 and CVE-2022-27518 for illegitimate access.[23][55]

S0225 sqlmap

sqlmap can be used to automate exploitation of SQL injection vulnerabilities.[115]

G1053 Storm-0501

Storm-0501 has exploited N-day vulnerabilities associated with public facing services to gain initial access to victim environments to include Zoho ManageEngine (CVE-2022-47966), Citrix NetScaler "Citrix Bleed" (CVE-2023-4966), and Adobe ColdFusion 2016 (CVE-2023-29300 or CVE-2023-38203).[116]

G0027 Threat Group-3390

Threat Group-3390 has exploited the Microsoft SharePoint vulnerability CVE-2019-0604 and CVE-2021-26855, CVE-2021-26857, CVE-2021-26858, and CVE-2021-27065 in Exchange Server.[117]

G1022 ToddyCat

ToddyCat has exploited the ProxyLogon vulnerability (CVE-2021-26855) to compromise Exchange Servers at multiple organizations.[118]

G1048 UNC3886

UNC3886 has exploited CVE-2022-42475 in FortiOS SSL VPNs to obtain access.[119][8]

C0039 Versa Director Zero Day Exploitation

Versa Director Zero Day Exploitation involved exploitation of a vulnerability in Versa Director servers, since identified as CVE-2024-39717, for initial access and code execution.[120]

G0123 Volatile Cedar

Volatile Cedar has targeted publicly facing web servers, with both automatic and manual vulnerability discovery.[121] [122]

G1017 Volt Typhoon

Volt Typhoon has gained initial access through exploitation of multiple vulnerabilities in internet-facing software and appliances such as Fortinet, Ivanti (formerly Pulse Secure), NETGEAR, Citrix, and Cisco.[123][124]

G1035 Winter Vivern

Winter Vivern has exploited known and zero-day vulnerabilities in software usch as Roundcube Webmail servers and the "Follina" vulnerability.[125][126]

S0412 ZxShell

ZxShell has been dropped through exploitation of CVE-2011-2462, CVE-2013-3163, and CVE-2014-0322.[127]

Mitigations

ID Mitigation Description
M1048 Application Isolation and Sandboxing

Application isolation will limit what other processes and system features the exploited target can access.

M1050 Exploit Protection

Web Application Firewalls may be used to limit exposure of applications to prevent exploit traffic from reaching the application.

M1037 Filter Network Traffic

Restrict outbound network traffic from public-facing servers to prevent unauthorized connections from initiating communications with attacker-controlled infrastructure. While this may not prevent the initial exploitation, it limits the attacker's ability to verify and control the compromised server post-exploit, reducing the overall impact of the attack.

M1035 Limit Access to Resource Over Network

Ensure that all publicly exposed services are actually intended to be so, and restrict access to any that should only be available internally.

M1030 Network Segmentation

Segment externally facing servers and services from the rest of the network with a DMZ or on separate hosting infrastructure.

M1026 Privileged Account Management

Use least privilege for service accounts will limit what permissions the exploited process gets on the rest of the system.

M1051 Update Software

Update software regularly by employing patch management for externally exposed applications.

M1016 Vulnerability Scanning

Regularly scan externally facing systems for vulnerabilities and establish procedures to rapidly patch systems when critical vulnerabilities are discovered through scanning and through public disclosure.[10]

Detection Strategy

ID Name Analytic ID Analytic Description
DET0080 Exploit Public-Facing Application – multi-signal correlation (request → error → post-exploit process/egress) AN0219

Adversary sends crafted HTTP/S (or other service) input to an Internet-facing app (IIS/ASP.NET, API, device portal). Chain: (1) abnormal request patterns to public endpoint → (2) elevated 4xx/5xx or unusual methods/paths → (3) server process (w3wp.exe/other service) spawns shell/LOLbins or loads non-standard modules → (4) optional outbound callback from the host/container.

AN0220

Adversary exploits Apache/Nginx/app servers. Chain: (1) suspicious requests in access logs → (2) spike of 5xx or WAF blocks → (3) web server or interpreter (apache2/nginx/php-fpm/node/python) spawns /bin/sh, curl, wget, socat, or writes webshell → (4) outbound callback.

AN0221

Adversary targets macOS-hosted public services (e.g., nginx, node). Chain: suspicious inbound request → service crash/5xx → service spawns shell or writes file → new outbound connection.

AN0222

Adversary exploits containerized app via ingress or service. Chain: (1) suspicious request in ingress/app logs → (2) container process spawns a shell/exec/sidecar (kubectl exec/docker exec) → (3) egress to Internet or metadata service (169.254.169.254).

AN0223

Adversary targets cloud-hosted public endpoints. Chain: (1) ALB/ELB/Cloud LB logs show exploit-like inputs or error spikes → (2) workload spawns shell or reaches metadata API → (3) egress to new external hosts.

AN0224

Adversary exploits exposed OpenSLP on ESXi or vCenter public endpoints. Chain: inbound request pattern to mgmt service → hostd/vpxd error/crash/restart → unexpected process behavior or datastore access → outbound callback.

AN0225

Adversary exploits public admin services on routers/firewalls/switches. Chain: anomalous HTTP/SNMP/SmartInstall inputs → device syslog errors/restarts → config changes/CLI spawn → egress to attacker C2.

References

  1. National Vulnerability Database. (2017, February 2). CVE-2016-6662 Detail. Retrieved April 3, 2018.
  2. CIS. (2017, May 15). Multiple Vulnerabilities in Microsoft Windows SMB Server Could Allow for Remote Code Execution. Retrieved April 3, 2018.
  3. US-CERT. (2018, April 20). Russian State-Sponsored Cyber Actors Targeting Network Infrastructure Devices. Retrieved October 19, 2020.
  4. Omar Santos. (2020, October 19). Attackers Continue to Target Legacy Devices. Retrieved October 20, 2020.
  5. National Vulnerability Database. (2017, September 24). CVE-2014-7169 Detail. Retrieved April 3, 2018.
  6. German Hoeffner, Aaron Soehnen and Gianni Perez. (2023, February 7). ESXiArgs Ransomware Targets Publicly-Exposed ESXi OpenSLP Servers. Retrieved March 26, 2025.
  7. Dan Goodin . (2021, February 25). Code-execution flaw in VMware has a severity rating of 9.8 out of 10. Retrieved April 8, 2025.
  8. Marvi, A. et al.. (2023, March 16). Fortinet Zero-Day and Custom Malware Used by Suspected Chinese Actor in Espionage Operation. Retrieved March 22, 2023.
  9. Greenberg, A. (2022, November 10). Russia’s New Cyberwarfare in Ukraine Is Fast, Dirty, and Relentless. Retrieved March 22, 2023.
  10. OWASP. (2018, February 23). OWASP Top Ten Project. Retrieved April 3, 2018.
  11. Christey, S., Brown, M., Kirby, D., Martin, B., Paller, A.. (2011, September 13). 2011 CWE/SANS Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Errors. Retrieved April 10, 2019.
  12. Amitai Ben & Shushan Ehrlich. (2021, May). From Wiper to Ransomware: The Evolution of Agrius. Retrieved May 21, 2024.
  13. Brady, S . (2018, October 3). Indictment - United States vs Aleksei Sergeyevich Morenets, et al.. Retrieved October 1, 2020.
  14. NSA, CISA, FBI, NCSC. (2021, July). Russian GRU Conducting Global Brute Force Campaign to Compromise Enterprise and Cloud Environments. Retrieved July 26, 2021.
  15. NCSC, CISA, FBI, NSA. (2021, May 7). Further TTPs associated with SVR cyber actors. Retrieved July 29, 2021.
  16. National Cyber Security Centre. (2020, July 16). Advisory: APT29 targets COVID-19 vaccine development. Retrieved September 29, 2020.
  17. Symantec. (2018, February 28). Chafer: Latest Attacks Reveal Heightened Ambitions. Retrieved May 22, 2020.
  18. Glyer, C, et al. (2020, March). This Is Not a Test: APT41 Initiates Global Intrusion Campaign Using Multiple Exploits. Retrieved April 28, 2020.
  19. Nikita Rostovcev. (2022, August 18). APT41 World Tour 2021 on a tight schedule. Retrieved February 22, 2024.
  20. DCSO CyTec Blog. (2022, December 24). APT41 — The spy who failed to encrypt me. Retrieved June 13, 2024.
  21. Perez, D. et al. (2021, April 20). Check Your Pulse: Suspected APT Actors Leverage Authentication Bypass Techniques and Pulse Secure Zero-Day. Retrieved February 5, 2024.
  22. Perez, D. et al. (2021, May 27). Re-Checking Your Pulse: Updates on Chinese APT Actors Compromising Pulse Secure VPN Devices. Retrieved February 5, 2024.
  23. National Security Agency. (2022, December). APT5: Citrix ADC Threat Hunting Guidance. Retrieved February 5, 2024.
  24. Microsoft Threat Intelligence. (2023, September). Digital threats from East Asia increase in breadth and effectiveness. Retrieved February 5, 2024.
  25. Canadian Centre for Cyber Security. (2024, April 24). Cyber Activity Impacting CISCO ASA VPNs. Retrieved January 6, 2025.
  26. Novetta. (n.d.). Operation SMN: Axiom Threat Actor Group Report. Retrieved November 12, 2014.
  27. Esler, J., Lee, M., and Williams, C. (2014, October 14). Threat Spotlight: Group 72. Retrieved January 14, 2016.
  28. Adam Burgher. (2021, June 10). BackdoorDiplomacy: Upgrading from Quarian to Turian. Retrieved September 1, 2021
  29. US Federal Bureau of Investigation & US Secret Service. (2022, February 11). Indicators of Compromise Associated with BlackByte Ransomware. Retrieved December 16, 2024.
  30. Huseyin Can Yuceel. (2022, February 21). TTPs used by BlackByte Ransomware Targeting Critical Infrastructure. Retrieved December 16, 2024.
  31. Symantec Threat Hunter Team. (2022, October 21). Exbyte: BlackByte Ransomware Attackers Deploy New Exfiltration Tool. Retrieved December 16, 2024.
  32. Microsoft Incident Response. (2023, July 6). The five-day job: A BlackByte ransomware intrusion case study. Retrieved December 16, 2024.
  33. Bermejo, L., et al. (2017, June 22). Following the Trail of BlackTech’s Cyber Espionage Campaigns. Retrieved May 5, 2020.
  34. Lambert, T. (2020, May 7). Introducing Blue Mockingbird. Retrieved May 26, 2020.
  35. Scott Henderson, Cristiana Kittner, Sarah Hawley & Mark Lechtik, Google Cloud. (2023, January 19). Suspected Chinese Threat Actors Exploiting FortiOS Vulnerability (CVE-2022-42475). Retrieved December 31, 2024.
  36. Rufus Brown, Van Ta, Douglas Bienstock, Geoff Ackerman, John Wolfram. (2022, March 8). Does This Look Infected? A Summary of APT41 Targeting U.S. State Governments. Retrieved July 8, 2022.
  37. Venere, G. Neal, C. (2022, June 21). Avos ransomware group expands with new attack arsenal. Retrieved January 11, 2023.
  38. Parisi, T. (2022, December 2). Not a SIMulation: CrowdStrike Investigations Reveal Intrusion Campaign Targeting Telco and BPO Companies. Retrieved June 30, 2023.
  39. Microsoft. (2022, May 9). Ransomware as a service: Understanding the cybercrime gig economy and how to protect yourself. Retrieved March 10, 2023.
  40. Microsoft Threat Intelligence. (2021, December 11). Guidance for preventing, detecting, and hunting for exploitation of the Log4j 2 vulnerability. Retrieved December 7, 2023.
  41. Biderman, O. et al. (2022, October 3). REVEALING EMPEROR DRAGONFLY: NIGHT SKY AND CHEERSCRYPT - A SINGLE RANSOMWARE GROUP. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
  42. Counter Threat Unit Research Team . (2022, June 23). BRONZE STARLIGHT RANSOMWARE OPERATIONS USE HUI LOADER. Retrieved December 7, 2023.
  43. Dutch Military Intelligence and Security Service (MIVD) & Dutch General Intelligence and Security Service (AIVD). (2024, February 6). Ministry of Defense of the Netherlands uncovers COATHANGER, a stealthy Chinese FortiGate RAT. Retrieved February 7, 2024.
  44. McLellan, T. et al. (2024, January 12). Cutting Edge: Suspected APT Targets Ivanti Connect Secure VPN in New Zero-Day Exploitation. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
  45. Meltzer, M. et al. (2024, January 10). Active Exploitation of Two Zero-Day Vulnerabilities in Ivanti Connect Secure VPN. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
  46. Gurkok, C. et al. (2024, January 15). Ivanti Connect Secure VPN Exploitation Goes Global. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
  47. Lin, M. et al. (2024, January 31). Cutting Edge, Part 2: Investigating Ivanti Connect Secure VPN Zero-Day Exploitation. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
  48. Lin, M. et al. (2024, February 27). Cutting Edge, Part 3: Investigating Ivanti Connect Secure VPN Exploitation and Persistence Attempts. Retrieved March 1, 2024.
  49. CISA. (2020, December 1). Russian State-Sponsored Advanced Persistent Threat Actor Compromises U.S. Government Targets. Retrieved December 9, 2021.
  50. Chen, J., et al. (2022). Delving Deep: An Analysis of Earth Lusca’s Operations. Retrieved July 1, 2022.
  51. Microsoft Threat Intelligence. (2023, June 14). Cadet Blizzard emerges as a novel and distinct Russian threat actor. Retrieved July 10, 2023.
  52. US Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency et al. (2024, September 5). Russian Military Cyber Actors Target U.S. and Global Critical Infrastructure. Retrieved September 6, 2024.
  53. Ta, V., et al. (2022, August 8). FIN13: A Cybercriminal Threat Actor Focused on Mexico. Retrieved February 9, 2023.
  54. Sygnia Incident Response Team. (2022, January 5). TG2003: ELEPHANT BEETLE UNCOVERING AN ORGANIZED FINANCIAL-THEFT OPERATION. Retrieved February 9, 2023.
  55. Raggi, Michael. (2024, May 22). IOC Extinction? China-Nexus Cyber Espionage Actors Use ORB Networks to Raise Cost on Defenders. Retrieved July 8, 2024.
  56. ClearSky. (2020, February 16). Fox Kitten – Widespread Iranian Espionage-Offensive Campaign. Retrieved December 21, 2020.
  57. Dragos. (n.d.). PARISITE. Retrieved December 21, 2020.
  58. Orleans, A. (2020, August 31). Who Is PIONEER KITTEN?. Retrieved December 21, 2020.
  59. CISA. (2020, September 15). Iran-Based Threat Actor Exploits VPN Vulnerabilities. Retrieved December 21, 2020.
  60. ClearSky. (2020, December 17). Pay2Key Ransomware – A New Campaign by Fox Kitten. Retrieved December 21, 2020.
  61. Mark Graham, Carolyn Ahlers, Kyle O'Meara; Dragos. (2024, July). Impact of FrostyGoop ICS Malware on Connected OT Systems. Retrieved November 20, 2024.
  62. Cybereason Nocturnus. (2019, June 25). Operation Soft Cell: A Worldwide Campaign Against Telecommunications Providers. Retrieved July 18, 2019.
  63. MSTIC. (2019, December 12). GALLIUM: Targeting global telecom. Retrieved January 13, 2021.
  64. Counter Threat Unit Research Team. (2019, September 24). REvil/Sodinokibi Ransomware. Retrieved August 4, 2020.
  1. MSTIC. (2021, March 2). HAFNIUM targeting Exchange Servers with 0-day exploits. Retrieved March 3, 2021.
  2. Gruzweig, J. et al. (2021, March 2). Operation Exchange Marauder: Active Exploitation of Multiple Zero-Day Microsoft Exchange Vulnerabilities. Retrieved March 3, 2021.
  3. Bromiley, M. et al. (2021, March 4). Detection and Response to Exploitation of Microsoft Exchange Zero-Day Vulnerabilities. Retrieved March 9, 2021.
  4. Microsoft Threat Intelligence Team & Detection and Response Team . (2022, April 12). Tarrask malware uses scheduled tasks for defense evasion. Retrieved June 1, 2022.
  5. Microsoft Threat Intelligence . (2025, March 5). Silk Typhoon targeting IT supply chain. Retrieved March 20, 2025.
  6. Ganani, M. (2015, May 14). Analysis of the Havij SQL Injection tool. Retrieved March 19, 2018.
  7. CISA. (2022, September 23). AA22-264A Iranian State Actors Conduct Cyber Operations Against the Government of Albania. Retrieved August 6, 2024.
  8. SOCRadar. (2024, January 24). Dark Web Profile: INC Ransom. Retrieved June 5, 2024.
  9. SentinelOne. (n.d.). What Is Inc. Ransomware?. Retrieved June 5, 2024.
  10. MSTIC. (2021, December 6). NICKEL targeting government organizations across Latin America and Europe. Retrieved March 18, 2022.
  11. KISA. (2021). Phishing Target Reconnaissance and Attack Resource Analysis Operation Muzabi. Retrieved March 8, 2024.
  12. CISA et al. (2024, July 8). People’s Republic of China (PRC) Ministry of State Security APT40 Tradecraft in Action. Retrieved February 3, 2025.
  13. Check Point. (2022, January 11). APT35 exploits Log4j vulnerability to distribute new modular PowerShell toolkit. Retrieved January 24, 2022.
  14. DFIR Report. (2022, March 21). APT35 Automates Initial Access Using ProxyShell. Retrieved May 25, 2022.
  15. Cybereason Nocturnus. (2022, February 1). PowerLess Trojan: Iranian APT Phosphorus Adds New PowerShell Backdoor for Espionage. Retrieved June 1, 2022.
  16. DFIR Report. (2021, November 15). Exchange Exploit Leads to Domain Wide Ransomware. Retrieved January 5, 2023.
  17. MSTIC. (2021, November 16). Evolving trends in Iranian threat actor activity – MSTIC presentation at CyberWarCon 2021. Retrieved January 12, 2023.
  18. Anthony Galiette, Doel Santos. (2024, January 11). Medusa Ransomware Turning Your Files into Stone. Retrieved October 15, 2025.
  19. Threat Hunter Team Symantec and Carbon Black. (2025, March 6). Medusa Ransomware Activity Continues to Increase. Retrieved October 15, 2025.
  20. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency. (2025, March 12). AA25-071A #StopRansomware: Medusa Ransomware. Retrieved October 15, 2025.
  21. GREAT. (2021, March 30). APT10: sophisticated multi-layered loader Ecipekac discovered in A41APT campaign. Retrieved June 17, 2021.
  22. Checkpoint Research. (2021, November 15). Uncovering MosesStaff techniques: Ideology over Money. Retrieved August 11, 2022.
  23. FBI, CISA, CNMF, NCSC-UK. (2022, February 24). Iranian Government-Sponsored Actors Conduct Cyber Operations Against Global Government and Commercial Networks. Retrieved September 27, 2022.
  24. McAfee® Foundstone® Professional Services and McAfee Labs™. (2011, February 10). Global Energy Cyberattacks: “Night Dragon”. Retrieved February 19, 2018.
  25. Cybereason Nocturnus. (2022, May 4). Operation CuckooBees: Deep-Dive into Stealthy Winnti Techniques. Retrieved September 22, 2022.
  26. Volexity Threat Research. (2024, April 12). Zero-Day Exploitation of Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution Vulnerability in GlobalProtect (CVE-2024-3400). Retrieved November 20, 2024.
  27. Unit 42. (2024, April 12). Threat Brief: Operation MidnightEclipse, Post-Exploitation Activity Related to CVE-2024-3400 . Retrieved January 15, 2025.
  28. Dantzig, M. v., Schamper, E. (2019, December 19). Operation Wocao: Shining a light on one of China’s hidden hacking groups. Retrieved October 8, 2020.
  29. CISA. (2023, December 18). #StopRansomware: Play Ransomware AA23-352A. Retrieved September 24, 2024.
  30. Trend Micro Research. (2023, July 21). Ransomware Spotlight: Play. Retrieved September 24, 2024.
  31. SentinelOne. (2022, November 30). Agenda (Qilin). Retrieved September 26, 2025.
  32. Microsoft Threat Intelligence. (2024, October 31). Chinese threat actor Storm-0940 uses credentials from password spray attacks from a covert network. Retrieved June 4, 2025.
  33. TP-Link . (2025, August 29). Technical News and Reports about Quad 7 (7777) Botnet aka CovertNetwork-1658. Retrieved October 10, 2025.
  34. Liebenberg, D.. (2018, August 30). Rocke: The Champion of Monero Miners. Retrieved May 26, 2020.
  35. Xingyu, J.. (2019, January 17). Malware Used by Rocke Group Evolves to Evade Detection by Cloud Security Products. Retrieved May 26, 2020.
  36. Cisco Talos. (2025, February 20). Weathering the storm: In the midst of a Typhoon. Retrieved February 24, 2025.
  37. National Security Agency. (2020, March 28). Sandworm Actors Exploiting Vulnerability In EXIM Mail Transfer Agent. Retrieved March 1, 2024.
  38. Billy Leonard. (2023, April 19). Ukraine remains Russia’s biggest cyber focus in 2023. Retrieved March 1, 2024.
  39. Cisco Talos. (2019, April 17). Sea Turtle: DNS Hijacking Abuses Trust In Core Internet Service. Retrieved November 20, 2024.
  40. PwC Threat Intelligence. (2023, December 5). The Tortoise and The Malware. Retrieved November 20, 2024.
  41. Lumelsly, A. et al. (2024, March 26). ShadowRay: First Known Attack Campaign Targeting AI Workloads Actively Exploited In The Wild. Retrieved December 2, 2024.
  42. Microsoft Threat Intelligence. (2025, July 22). Disrupting active exploitation of on-premises SharePoint vulnerabilities. Retrieved October 15, 2025.
  43. ESET Research. (2025, July 24). ToolShell: An all-you-can-eat buffet for threat actors. Retrieved October 15, 2025.
  44. Eye Security. (2025, July 19). SharePoint Under Siege: ToolShell Exploit (CVE-2025-49706 & CVE-2025-49704). Retrieved October 15, 2025.
  45. Trend Micro Research. (2022, July 22). Proactive Security Insights for SharePoint Attacks (CVE-2025-53770 and CVE-2025-53771). Retrieved October 15, 2025.
  46. Kenin, S. et al. (2025, July 21). SharePoint ToolShell | Zero-Day Exploited in-the-Wild Targets Enterprise Servers. Retrieved October 15, 2025.
  47. Unit 42. (2025, July 31). Active Exploitation of Microsoft SharePoint Vulnerabilities: Threat Brief (Updated). Retrieved October 15, 2025.
  48. Prizmant, D. (2021, June 7). Siloscape: First Known Malware Targeting Windows Containers to Compromise Cloud Environments. Retrieved June 9, 2021.
  49. Cash, D. et al. (2020, December 14). Dark Halo Leverages SolarWinds Compromise to Breach Organizations. Retrieved December 29, 2020.
  50. CISA. (2020, July 16). MAR-10296782-1.v1 – SOREFANG. Retrieved September 29, 2020.
  51. Damele, B., Stampar, M. (n.d.). sqlmap. Retrieved March 19, 2018.
  52. Microsoft Threat Intelligence. (2024, September 26). Storm-0501: Ransomware attacks expanding to hybrid cloud environments. Retrieved October 19, 2025.
  53. Lunghi, D. and Lu, K. (2021, April 9). Iron Tiger APT Updates Toolkit With Evolved SysUpdate Malware. Retrieved November 12, 2021.
  54. Dedola, G. (2022, June 21). APT ToddyCat. Retrieved January 3, 2024.
  55. Punsaen Boonyakarn, Shawn Chew, Logeswaran Nadarajan, Mathew Potaczek, Jakub Jozwiak, and Alex Marvi. (2024, June 18). Cloaked and Covert: Uncovering UNC3886 Espionage Operations. Retrieved September 24, 2024.
  56. Black Lotus Labs. (2024, August 27). Taking The Crossroads: The Versa Director Zero-Day Exploitaiton. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
  57. Threat Intelligence and Research. (2015, March 30). VOLATILE CEDAR. Retrieved February 8, 2021.
  58. ClearSky Cyber Security. (2021, January). “Lebanese Cedar” APT Global Lebanese Espionage Campaign Leveraging Web Servers. Retrieved February 10, 2021.
  59. Counter Threat Unit Research Team. (2023, May 24). Chinese Cyberespionage Group BRONZE SILHOUETTE Targets U.S. Government and Defense Organizations. Retrieved July 27, 2023.
  60. CISA et al.. (2024, February 7). PRC State-Sponsored Actors Compromise and Maintain Persistent Access to U.S. Critical Infrastructure. Retrieved May 15, 2024.
  61. Matthieu Faou. (2023, October 25). Winter Vivern exploits zero-day vulnerability in Roundcube Webmail servers. Retrieved July 29, 2024.
  62. Michael Raggi & The Proofpoint Threat Research Team. (2023, March 30). Exploitation is a Dish Best Served Cold: Winter Vivern Uses Known Zimbra Vulnerability to Target Webmail Portals of NATO-Aligned Governments in Europe. Retrieved July 29, 2024.
  63. Allievi, A., et al. (2014, October 28). Threat Spotlight: Group 72, Opening the ZxShell. Retrieved September 24, 2019.