Brute Force: Password Guessing

Adversaries with no prior knowledge of legitimate credentials within the system or environment may guess passwords to attempt access to accounts. Without knowledge of the password for an account, an adversary may opt to systematically guess the password using a repetitive or iterative mechanism. An adversary may guess login credentials without prior knowledge of system or environment passwords during an operation by using a list of common passwords. Password guessing may or may not take into account the target's policies on password complexity or use policies that may lock accounts out after a number of failed attempts.

Guessing passwords can be a risky option because it could cause numerous authentication failures and account lockouts, depending on the organization's login failure policies. [1]

Typically, management services over commonly used ports are used when guessing passwords. Commonly targeted services include the following:

  • SSH (22/TCP)
  • Telnet (23/TCP)
  • FTP (21/TCP)
  • NetBIOS / SMB / Samba (139/TCP & 445/TCP)
  • LDAP (389/TCP)
  • Kerberos (88/TCP)
  • RDP / Terminal Services (3389/TCP)
  • HTTP/HTTP Management Services (80/TCP & 443/TCP)
  • MSSQL (1433/TCP)
  • Oracle (1521/TCP)
  • MySQL (3306/TCP)
  • VNC (5900/TCP)
  • SNMP (161/UDP and 162/TCP/UDP)

In addition to management services, adversaries may "target single sign-on (SSO) and cloud-based applications utilizing federated authentication protocols," as well as externally facing email applications, such as Office 365.[2]. Further, adversaries may abuse network device interfaces (such as wlanAPI) to brute force accessible wifi-router(s) via wireless authentication protocols.[3]

In default environments, LDAP and Kerberos connection attempts are less likely to trigger events over SMB, which creates Windows "logon failure" event ID 4625.

ID: T1110.001
Sub-technique of:  T1110
Platforms: Containers, ESXi, IaaS, Identity Provider, Linux, Network Devices, Office Suite, SaaS, Windows, macOS
Contributors: Microsoft Threat Intelligence Center (MSTIC); Mohamed Kmal
Version: 1.7
Created: 11 February 2020
Last Modified: 24 October 2025

Procedure Examples

ID Name Description
G0007 APT28

APT28 has used a brute-force/password-spray tooling that operated in two modes: in brute-force mode it typically sent over 300 authentication attempts per hour per targeted account over the course of several hours or days.[4] APT28 has also used a Kubernetes cluster to conduct distributed, large-scale password guessing attacks.[5]

G0016 APT29

APT29 has successfully conducted password guessing attacks against a list of mailboxes.[6]

S0020 China Chopper

China Chopper's server component can perform brute force password guessing against authentication portals.[7]

S0488 CrackMapExec

CrackMapExec can brute force passwords for a specified user on a single target system or across an entire network.[8]

S0367 Emotet

Emotet has been observed using a hard coded list of passwords to brute force user accounts. [9][10][11][12][13][14]

S0698 HermeticWizard

HermeticWizard can use a list of hardcoded credentials in attempt to authenticate to SMB shares.[15]

S0532 Lucifer

Lucifer has attempted to brute force TCP ports 135 (RPC) and 1433 (MSSQL) with the default username or list of usernames and passwords.[16]

S0598 P.A.S. Webshell

P.A.S. Webshell can use predefined users and passwords to execute brute force attacks against SSH, FTP, POP3, MySQL, MSSQL, and PostgreSQL services.[17]

S0453 Pony

Pony has used a small dictionary of common passwords against a collected list of local accounts.[18]

S0374 SpeakUp

SpeakUp can perform brute forcing using a pre-defined list of usernames and passwords in an attempt to log in to administrative panels. [19]

S0341 Xbash

Xbash can obtain a list of weak passwords from the C2 server to use for brute forcing as well as attempt to brute force services with open ports.[20][21]

Mitigations

ID Mitigation Description
M1036 Account Use Policies

Set account lockout policies after a certain number of failed login attempts to prevent passwords from being guessed. Too strict a policy may create a denial of service condition and render environments un-usable, with all accounts used in the brute force being locked-out. Use conditional access policies to block logins from non-compliant devices or from outside defined organization IP ranges.[22] Consider blocking risky authentication requests, such as those originating from anonymizing services/proxies.[23]

M1032 Multi-factor Authentication

Use multi-factor authentication. Where possible, also enable multi-factor authentication on externally facing services.

M1027 Password Policies

Refer to NIST guidelines when creating password policies. [24]

M1051 Update Software

Upgrade management services to the latest supported and compatible version. Specifically, any version providing increased password complexity or policy enforcement preventing default or weak passwords.

Detection Strategy

ID Name Analytic ID Analytic Description
DET0551 Password Guessing via Multi-Source Authentication Failure Correlation AN1521

Series of authentication failures (Event ID 4625) targeting the same or similar user accounts over time from one or more remote IPs

AN1522

Repeated failed SSH login attempts followed by a possible success from the same remote host

AN1523

Series of failed logins from loginwindow or sshd with repeated usernames or password prompts

AN1524

Multiple failed sign-in attempts from external sources across many users followed by success from the same IP

AN1525

Login attempt failures over SNMP, Telnet, or SSH interface, often reflected in logs or syslog events

AN1526

Password guessing attempts against web-based apps (e.g., Dropbox, Google Workspace) reflected in API or sign-in logs

References