Scheduled Task

From enterprise
Jump to: navigation, search
Scheduled Task
ID T1053
Tactic Execution, Persistence, Privilege Escalation
Platform Windows
Permissions Required User, Administrator, SYSTEM
Effective Permissions User, Administrator, SYSTEM
Data Sources File monitoring, Process command-line parameters, Process monitoring, Windows event logs
Supports Remote Yes
Contributors Travis Smith, Tripwire, Leo Loobeek, @leoloobeek, Alain Homewood, Insomnia Security

Utilities such as at and schtasks, along with the Windows Task Scheduler, can be used to schedule programs or scripts to be executed at a date and time. A task can also be scheduled on a remote system, provided the proper authentication is met to use RPC and file and printer sharing is turned on. Scheduling a task on a remote system typically required being a member of the Administrators group on the the remote system.1

An adversary may use task scheduling to execute programs at system startup or on a scheduled basis for persistence, to conduct remote Execution as part of Lateral Movement, to gain SYSTEM privileges, or to run a process under the context of a specified account.


  • APT18 actors used the native at Windows task scheduler tool to use scheduled tasks for execution on a victim network.2
  • APT29 used named and hijacked scheduled tasks to establish persistence.3
  • An APT3 downloader creates persistence by creating the following scheduled task: schtasks /create /tn "mysc" /tr C:\Users\Public\test.exe /sc ONLOGON /ru "System".4
  • APT32 has used scheduled tasks to persist on victim systems.5
  • BRONZE BUTLER has used at and schtasks to register a scheduled task to execute malware during lateral movement.6
  • Dragonfly has used a scheduled task to execute a malicious file.7
  • FIN10 has established persistence by using S4U tasks as well as the Scheduled Task option in PowerShell Empire.89
  • FIN6 has used scheduled tasks to establish persistence for various malware it uses, including downloaders known as HARDTACK and SHIPBREAD and PoS malware known as TRINITY.10
  • FIN7 malware has created scheduled tasks to establish persistence.1112
  • FIN8 has used scheduled tasks to maintain RDP backdoors.13
  • Stealth Falcon malware creates a scheduled task entitled “IE Web Cache” to execute a malicious file hourly.14
  • Threat Group-3390 actors use at to schedule tasks to run self-extracting RAR archives, which install HTTPBrowser or PlugX on other victims on a network.
  • menuPass has used a script ( to execute a command on a target machine via Task Scheduler.15
  • BADNEWS creates a scheduled task to establish Persistence by executing a malicious payload every subsequent minute.16
  • CosmicDuke uses scheduled tasks typically named "Watchmon Service" for persistence.17
  • One persistence mechanism used by CozyCar is to register itself as a scheduled task.18
  • Adversaries can instruct Duqu to spread laterally by copying itself to shares it has enumerated and for which it has obtained legitimate credentials (via keylogging or other means). The remote host is then infected by using the compromised credentials to schedule a task on remote machines that executes the malware.19
  • Gazer can establish persistence by creating a scheduled task. 2021
  • Helminth has used a scheduled task for persistence.22
  • ISMInjector creates scheduled tasks to establish persistence.23
  • JHUHUGIT has registered itself as a scheduled task to run each time the current user logs in.2425
  • MURKYTOP has the capability to schedule remote AT jobs.26
  • Matroyshka can establish persistence by adding a Scheduled Task named "Microsoft Boost Kernel Optimization".2728
  • POWRUNER persists through a scheduled task that executes it every minute.29
  • PowerSploit's New-UserPersistenceOption Persistence argument can be used to establish Persistence via a Scheduled Task.3031
  • Pteranodon schedules tasks to invoke its components in order to establish persistence.32
  • RTM tries to add a scheduled task to establish persistence.33
  • RemoteCMD can execute commands remotely by creating a new schedule task on the remote system 34
  • Remsec schedules the execution one of its modules by creating a new scheduler task.35
  • Shamoon copies an executable payload to the target system by using Windows Admin Shares and then scheduling an unnamed task to execute the malware.3637
  • at can be used to schedule a task on a system.38
  • schtasks is used to schedule tasks on a Windows system to run at a specific date and time.39


Limit privileges of user accounts and remediate Privilege Escalation vectors so only authorized administrators can create scheduled tasks on remote systems. Toolkits like the PowerSploit framework contain PowerUp modules that can be used to explore systems for permission weaknesses in scheduled tasks that could be used to escalate privileges.40

Configure settings for scheduled tasks to force tasks to run under the context of the authenticated account instead of allowing them to run as SYSTEM. The associated Registry key is located at HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Lsa\SubmitControl. The setting can be configured through GPO: Computer Configuration > [Policies] > Windows Settings > Security Settings > Local Policies > Security Options: Domain Controller: Allow server operators to schedule tasks, set to disabled.41

Configure the Increase Scheduling Priority option to only allow the Administrators group the rights to schedule a priority process. This can be can be configured through GPO: Computer Configuration > [Policies] > Windows Settings > Security Settings > Local Policies > User Rights Assignment: Increase scheduling priority.42

Identify and block unnecessary system utilities or potentially malicious software that may be used to schedule tasks using whitelisting43 tools, like AppLocker,4445 or Software Restriction Policies46 where appropriate.47


Monitor scheduled task creation from common utilities using command-line invocation. Legitimate scheduled tasks may be created during installation of new software or through system administration functions. Monitor process execution from the svchost.exe in Windows 10 and the Windows Task Scheduler taskeng.exe for older versions of Windows.48 If scheduled tasks are not used for persistence, then the adversary is likely to remove the task when the action is complete. Monitor Windows Task Scheduler stores in %systemroot%\System32\Tasks for change entries related to scheduled tasks that do not correlate with known software, patch cycles, etc. Data and events should not be viewed in isolation, but as part of a chain of behavior that could lead to other activities, such as network connections made for Command and Control, learning details about the environment through Discovery, and Lateral Movement.

Configure event logging for scheduled task creation and changes by enabling the "Microsoft-Windows-TaskScheduler/Operational" setting within the event logging service.49 Several events will then be logged on scheduled task activity, including:50

  • Event ID 106 - Scheduled task registered
  • Event ID 140 - Scheduled task updated
  • Event ID 141 - Scheduled task removed

Tools such as Sysinternals Autoruns may also be used to detect system changes that could be attempts at persistence, including listing current scheduled tasks.51 Look for changes to tasks that do not correlate with known software, patch cycles, etc. Suspicious program execution through scheduled tasks may show up as outlier processes that have not been seen before when compared against historical data.

Monitor processes and command-line arguments for actions that could be taken to create tasks. Remote access tools with built-in features may interact directly with the Windows API to perform these functions outside of typical system utilities. Tasks may also be created through Windows system management tools such as Windows Management Instrumentation and PowerShell, so additional logging may need to be configured to gather the appropriate data.


  1. ^  Microsoft. (2005, January 21). Task Scheduler and security. Retrieved June 8, 2016.
  2. ^  Carvey, H.. (2014, September 2). Where you AT?: Indicators of lateral movement using at.exe on Windows 7 systems. Retrieved January 25, 2016.
  3. ^  Dunwoody, M. and Carr, N.. (2016, September 27). No Easy Breach DerbyCon 2016. Retrieved October 4, 2016.
  4. ^  Moran, N., et al. (2014, November 21). Operation Double Tap. Retrieved January 14, 2016.
  5. ^  Carr, N.. (2017, May 14). Cyber Espionage is Alive and Well: APT32 and the Threat to Global Corporations. Retrieved June 18, 2017.
  6. ^  Counter Threat Unit Research Team. (2017, October 12). BRONZE BUTLER Targets Japanese Enterprises. Retrieved January 4, 2018.
  7. ^  US-CERT. (2017, October 20). Alert (TA17-293A): Advanced Persistent Threat Activity Targeting Energy and Other Critical Infrastructure Sectors. Retrieved November 2, 2017.
  8. ^  FireEye iSIGHT Intelligence. (2017, June 16). FIN10: Anatomy of a Cyber Extortion Operation. Retrieved June 25, 2017.
  9. ^  Schroeder, W., Warner, J., Nelson, M. (n.d.). Github PowerShellEmpire. Retrieved April 28, 2016.
  10. ^  FireEye Threat Intelligence. (2016, April). Follow the Money: Dissecting the Operations of the Cyber Crime Group FIN6. Retrieved June 1, 2016.
  11. ^  Carr, N., et al. (2017, April 24). FIN7 Evolution and the Phishing LNK. Retrieved April 24, 2017.
  12. ^  Gorelik, M.. (2017, June 9). FIN7 Takes Another Bite at the Restaurant Industry. Retrieved July 13, 2017.
  13. ^  Elovitz, S. & Ahl, I. (2016, August 18). Know Your Enemy: New Financially-Motivated & Spear-Phishing Group. Retrieved February 26, 2018.
  14. ^  Marczak, B. and Scott-Railton, J.. (2016, May 29). Keep Calm and (Don’t) Enable Macros: A New Threat Actor Targets UAE Dissidents. Retrieved June 8, 2016.
  15. ^  PwC and BAE Systems. (2017, April). Operation Cloud Hopper: Technical Annex. Retrieved April 13, 2017.
  16. ^  Levene, B. et al.. (2018, March 7). Patchwork Continues to Deliver BADNEWS to the Indian Subcontinent. Retrieved March 31, 2018.
  17. ^  F-Secure Labs. (2014, July). COSMICDUKE Cosmu with a twist of MiniDuke. Retrieved July 3, 2014.
  18. ^  F-Secure Labs. (2015, April 22). CozyDuke: Malware Analysis. Retrieved December 10, 2015.
  19. ^  Symantec Security Response. (2011, November). W32.Duqu: The precursor to the next Stuxnet. Retrieved September 17, 2015.
  20. ^  ESET. (2017, August). Gazing at Gazer: Turla’s new second stage backdoor. Retrieved September 14, 2017.
  21. ^  Kaspersky Lab's Global Research & Analysis Team. (2017, August 30). Introducing WhiteBear. Retrieved September 21, 2017.
  22. ^  ClearSky Cybersecurity. (2017, January 5). Iranian Threat Agent OilRig Delivers Digitally Signed Malware, Impersonates University of Oxford. Retrieved May 3, 2017.
  23. ^  Falcone, R. and Lee, B. (2017, October 9). OilRig Group Steps Up Attacks with New Delivery Documents and New Injector Trojan. Retrieved January 8, 2018.
  24. ^  ESET. (2016, October). En Route with Sednit - Part 1: Approaching the Target. Retrieved November 8, 2016.
  25. ^  ESET Research. (2015, July 10). Sednit APT Group Meets Hacking Team. Retrieved March 1, 2017.
  26. ^  FireEye. (2018, March 16). Suspected Chinese Cyber Espionage Group (TEMP.Periscope) Targeting U.S. Engineering and Maritime Industries. Retrieved April 11, 2018.
  1. ^  ClearSky Cyber Security and Trend Micro. (2017, July). Operation Wilted Tulip: Exposing a cyber espionage apparatus. Retrieved August 21, 2017.
  2. ^  Minerva Labs LTD and ClearSky Cyber Security. (2015, November 23). CopyKittens Attack Group. Retrieved September 11, 2017.
  3. ^  Sardiwal, M, et al. (2017, December 7). New Targeted Attack in the Middle East by APT34, a Suspected Iranian Threat Group, Using CVE-2017-11882 Exploit. Retrieved December 20, 2017.
  4. ^  PowerShellMafia. (2012, May 26). PowerSploit - A PowerShell Post-Exploitation Framework. Retrieved February 6, 2018.
  5. ^  PowerSploit. (n.d.). PowerSploit. Retrieved February 6, 2018.
  6. ^  Kasza, A. and Reichel, D.. (2017, February 27). The Gamaredon Group Toolset Evolution. Retrieved March 1, 2017.
  7. ^  Faou, M. and Boutin, J.. (2017, February). Read The Manual: A Guide to the RTM Banking Trojan. Retrieved March 9, 2017.
  8. ^  Symantec Security Response. (2016, September 6). Buckeye cyberespionage group shifts gaze from US to Hong Kong. Retrieved September 26, 2016.
  9. ^  Kaspersky Lab's Global Research & Analysis Team. (2016, August 9). The ProjectSauron APT. Technical Analysis. Retrieved August 17, 2016.
  10. ^  FireEye. (2016, November 30). FireEye Responds to Wave of Destructive Cyber Attacks in Gulf Region. Retrieved January 11, 2017.
  11. ^  Falcone, R.. (2016, November 30). Shamoon 2: Return of the Disttrack Wiper. Retrieved January 11, 2017.
  12. ^  Microsoft. (n.d.). At. Retrieved April 28, 2016.
  13. ^  Microsoft. (n.d.). Schtasks. Retrieved April 28, 2016.
  14. ^  PowerSploit. (n.d.). Retrieved December 4, 2014.
  15. ^  Microsoft. (2012, November 15). Domain controller: Allow server operators to schedule tasks. Retrieved December 18, 2017.
  16. ^  Microsoft. (2013, May 8). Increase scheduling priority. Retrieved December 18, 2017.
  17. ^  Beechey, J. (2010, December). Application Whitelisting: Panacea or Propaganda?. Retrieved November 18, 2014.
  18. ^  Tomonaga, S. (2016, January 26). Windows Commands Abused by Attackers. Retrieved February 2, 2016.
  19. ^  NSA Information Assurance Directorate. (2014, August). Application Whitelisting Using Microsoft AppLocker. Retrieved March 31, 2016.
  20. ^  Corio, C., & Sayana, D. P. (2008, June). Application Lockdown with Software Restriction Policies. Retrieved November 18, 2014.
  21. ^  Microsoft. (2012, June 27). Using Software Restriction Policies and AppLocker Policies. Retrieved April 7, 2016.
  22. ^  Loobeek, L. (2017, December 8). leoloobeek Status. Retrieved December 12, 2017.
  23. ^  Satyajit321. (2015, November 3). Scheduled Tasks History Retention settings. Retrieved December 12, 2017.
  24. ^  Microsoft. (n.d.). General Task Registration. Retrieved December 12, 2017.
  25. ^  Russinovich, M. (2016, January 4). Autoruns for Windows v13.51. Retrieved June 6, 2016.