The sub-techniques beta is now live! Read the release blog post for more info.

Component Object Model Hijacking

The Component Object Model (COM) is a system within Windows to enable interaction between software components through the operating system. [1] Adversaries can use this system to insert malicious code that can be executed in place of legitimate software through hijacking the COM references and relationships as a means for persistence. Hijacking a COM object requires a change in the Windows Registry to replace a reference to a legitimate system component which may cause that component to not work when executed. When that system component is executed through normal system operation the adversary's code will be executed instead. [2] An adversary is likely to hijack objects that are used frequently enough to maintain a consistent level of persistence, but are unlikely to break noticeable functionality within the system as to avoid system instability that could lead to detection.

ID: T1122
Tactic: Defense Evasion, Persistence
Platform: Windows
Permissions Required: User
Data Sources: Windows Registry, DLL monitoring, Loaded DLLs
Defense Bypassed: Autoruns Analysis
Contributors: ENDGAME
Version: 1.0
Created: 31 May 2017
Last Modified: 18 April 2019

Procedure Examples

Name Description

Some variants of ADVSTORESHELL achieve persistence by registering the payload as a Shell Icon Overlay handler COM object.[3]


APT28 has used COM hijacking for persistence by replacing the legitimate MMDeviceEnumerator object with a payload.[4][9]


BBSRAT has been seen persisting via COM hijacking through replacement of the COM object for MruPidlList {{42aedc87-2188-41fd-b9a3-0c966feabec1}} or Microsoft WBEM New Event Subsystem {{F3130CDB-AA52-4C3A-AB32-85FFC23AF9C1}} depending on the system's CPU architecture.[8]


ComRAT samples have been seen which hijack COM objects for persistence by replacing the path to shell32.dll in registry location HKCU\Software\Classes\CLSID{{42aedc87-2188-41fd-b9a3-0c966feabec1}}\InprocServer32.[6]


JHUHUGIT has used COM hijacking to establish persistence by hijacking a class named MMDeviceEnumerator and also by registering the payload as a Shell Icon Overlay handler COM object ({{3543619C-D563-43f7-95EA-4DA7E1CC396A}}).[4][5]


Mosquito uses COM hijacking as a method of persistence.[7]


This type of attack technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on the abuse of system features.


There are opportunities to detect COM hijacking by searching for Registry references that have been replaced and through Registry operations replacing know binary paths with unknown paths. Even though some third party applications define user COM objects, the presence of objects within HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Classes\CLSID\ may be anomalous and should be investigated since user objects will be loaded prior to machine objects in HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Classes\CLSID\. [10] Registry entries for existing COM objects may change infrequently. When an entry with a known good path and binary is replaced or changed to an unusual value to point to an unknown binary in a new location, then it may indicate suspicious behavior and should be investigated. Likewise, if software DLL loads are collected and analyzed, any unusual DLL load that can be correlated with a COM object Registry modification may indicate COM hijacking has been performed.